dura o efeito viagra 25mg
a bird in the house margaret laurence essay
how to make an outline for a research paper mla
sample compare and contrast essay high school
augmentin and yeast infections
essay bayen by mahasweta devi
academic essay ghostwriter for hire
go to link
help for dissertation writing
welding research paper topics
lasix over the counter
examples of report essay
essay the miracle of a voice
language essay tok
drinking wine taking viagra
advantages and disadvantages of bottled water essay
essay on superconductors
bullied at work definition essay
SIPO publishes new enforcement guidelines for comments on March 4, 2016. The new guidelines include:
(1) Patent Infringement Activity Identification Guideline(《专利侵权行为认定指南》);
(2) Patent Administrative Enforcement Evidence Guideline (《专利行政执法证据规则指引》);
(3) Other Patent Disputes Administrative Mediation Guideline (《其他专利纠纷行政调解指南》).
The deadline for comments is April 5, 2016, see http://www.sipo.gov.cn/tz/gz/201603/t20160304_1246757.html.
For those prefer or advocate judicial enforcement, the administrative enforcement appears to be here to stay. It is important to take advantage of the administrative procedures. According to available statistics, SIPO and its local offices handled 24479 patent-related disputes in 2014, and 21334 patent-related disputes in the first 10 months of 2015.